United Electric Controls - Experts & Thought Leaders

United Electric Controls are pleased to announce that Moody Price will be the new United Electric Controls representative for the State of Texas, adding to their existing region of Louisiana, Alabama, Mississippi, Arkansas, Florida Panhandle, Memphis Area and Texas, effective May 1, 2023. United Electric Controls (UE) is a privately held corporation founded in 1931 and headquartered in Watertown, Massachusetts, USA, including two divisions – Applied Sensor Technologies (AST) and Precision Sensors (PSI). United Electric Controls (UE) Their products are critical for safety, alarm and emergency shutdown (ESD) functions United Electric Controls are a global manufacturer of standard and custom-designed electronic and electromechanical, pressure and temperature switches, transmitters, transmitters with relay outputs, RTDs and thermocouples, and wireless gas detectors for the OEM, process, discrete, semiconductor, aerospace and defense industries. Their products are critical for safety, alarm and emergency shutdown (ESD) functions that protect equipment, processes, personnel and the environment. Moody Price Moody Price has been in business since 1955 and has locations throughout the Gulf Coast. Moody Price offers chemical, petrochemical, refining, power/cogeneration, and oil and gas customers’ high value service and technical support. Their goal is to provide their customers with recommendations and support that improve process reliability, reduce overall cost of ownership and enhance personnel safety.

National codes such as the NFPA 72, National Fire Alarm and Signaling Code, National Fire Alarm Protection Association, and international standards like EN 60079-29 provide considerable prescriptive guidance and performance-based requirements on how fire and gas systems should be designed and deployed within a facility. IEC performance-based standards Process plants and facilities also look to the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) which has promulgated performance-based standards like IEC 61508 (Functional safety of electrical/electronic/programmable electronic safety-related systems) and IEC 61511 (Functional safety – Safety instrumented systems for the process industry sector). Using these IEC performance-based standards as a foundation, technical committees composed of certified functional safety experts (CFSE) from the largest process operators in the world have provided informative guidance through technical reports like the ISA Technical Report (TR) 84.00.07 ‘Guidance on the Evaluation of Fire, Combustible Gas, and Toxic Gas System Effectiveness’ as well as ISA Technical Report (TR) 84.00.08 ‘Guidance for the Application of Wireless Sensor Technology to Non-SIS Independent Protection Layers.’ Taken together, operators can have better guidance on how to evaluate and deploy wireless gas detection in their plants. remote monitoring The application of wireless gas detectors can be extended to a broader system Virtually every major petrochemical or chemical operator has historically started from a position where wireless devices are allowed for remote monitoring or in-plant monitoring only. With technical reports such as the ISA TR 84.00.08, the application of wireless gas detectors can be extended to a broader system, i.e. a non-SIS Independent Protection Layer (IPL).  Wireless gas detectors Wireless gas detectors offer operators the opportunity to increase their gas coverage density at half the cost compared to wired gas detectors. Wireless gas detectors can be flexibly deployed at any location, building a pervasive sensing environment for IPLs to enhance the protection of personnel, provide more inputs for asset integrity management, as well as aid in environmental regulatory compliance.

Often UEC is asked by its customers if the wireless gas detector can be installed at longer distances from a mesh network than it recommends. A typical transmitter, like the Vanguard detector, running at 2.4 GHz will have a 2 dBi gain antenna. With a 2 dBi gain antenna, the signal transmitted by the device will be fairly close to omnidirectional in the horizontal plane providing reliable performance over reasonable distances. Correct antenna selection Customers may also have a tank farm several hundred feet from the closest gateway or mesh network. Two solutions employed typically are the use of repeaters to bridge the distance or higher gain antennas. The use of repeaters can be expensive and not necessary at times. Using a higher gain antenna may be a great choice, but not as straightforward as it may seem. The trade-off is around the directionality of a signal and not understanding how gain relates to transmission distance. Correct antenna selection and proper placement of devices can make all the difference in communication performance. What determines gain in an antenna? A ‘perfect antenna’ is assumed to be an ideal, single-point source with equal radiation in all directions The gain of an antenna is a combination of its efficiency and its directivity. The directivity is how powerful the signal is compared to a ‘perfect antenna’ which would spread the power in all directions equally. A ‘perfect antenna’ is assumed to be an ideal, single-point source with equal radiation in all directions, which is not really possible. When users see antenna gain specifications they are usually stated in dBi (dB isotropic) comparing the antenna to the ‘perfect antenna’. The antenna efficiency is just the efficiency at which it converts its input signal into radiation and vice versa. How does gain impact beam spread and what impact is this on installation? It’s important to note that gain and beam spread are mutually exclusive. An antenna cannot have high gain in all directions, so when a higher gain antenna is selected, the beam spread will be limited. For instance, when moving from a 2dB antenna to a 6dB antenna, the beam width will change from approximately 80 degrees in the vertical plane to approximately 40 degrees. So if there is a large elevation distance between the devices, the user could actually see the poorer performance with a high-gain antenna. During design and installation, it is important to take into consideration this trade-off. How does gain impact distance? Changing from the 2dB antenna to the 6 dB antenna could yield about a 58% longer range In a perfect world, 6dB (4x) more gain would provide 3dB (2x) more range. This is due to the fact that the surface area of a sphere is related to the square of its radius. So, changing a 2dB antenna to a 4.3dB antenna could yield about 28% more range. Changing from the 2dB antenna to the 6 dB antenna could yield about a 58% longer range. Steps for reliable performance Of course, users do not live in a perfect world and this is seldom the case. In general RF radiation can be expected to do exactly what they don’t want it to do. There are some steps users can take to get more reliable performance when placing antennas, however: Clear the immediate area of the antenna. Obstacles close to the antenna will provide much more interference than those far away, as they might reflect the energy and change the radiation pattern of the antenna. In the worst case, a conductive object could couple with the antenna enough to change its impedance, thus reflecting the power back into the radio. Basically, the antenna will only perform as specified if there’s about half a meter of free space around it. This includes the area behind the antenna range. Raise the antenna and clear the range. Often times raising the antenna above obstacles can be more effective than increasing its gain. As with our Vanguard TCD60 wireless gas detector, antennas are often removable and can be extended with commonly available cables. Choose the right antenna for the job. In general, a higher gain omnidirectional antenna is preferable in outdoor environments with fewer obstacles and little to no elevation gain. When indoors, a signal can be reflected off several obstacles causing the line of sight signal to be the weaker signal. In these environments, it is sometimes preferable to have a lower gain omnidirectional antenna which is less directive, especially if there is a significant elevation difference between sensors.