Download PDF version

Devices with wireless communication using proprietary radios have been installed in tough industrial applications for several decades.

With the modernization of industrial networks and the rapid adoption of technologies related to the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT), there has been an increasing demand for non-proprietary (i.e. open) wireless communication technologies.

Proprietary protocols

Proprietary protocols are those designed and created by a single manufacturer. One of the advantages of using proprietary protocols is that they can be highly customized to the user’s application since the manufacturer has ownership of the protocol design and how it is implemented.

On the downside, however, once users are locked into a proprietary protocol, it is hard to migrate to a different system. There is also the danger of the manufacturer discontinuing the product line with its associated proprietary protocol, or even its entire operations. Users are held captive to a vendor’s proprietary technologies, which is risky.

Open protocols

Open protocols are typically viewed as being more secure and safer compared to proprietary technologies

Open protocols (e.g. WirelessHART, ISA100) are collaboratively developed by a consortium or group of users; and while it may be frowned upon as a one-size-fits-all approach to wireless communication technologies, its benefits far outweigh its limitations.

For example, open protocols facilitate interoperability between devices from different brands. As a user, they have the freedom to purchase from various vendors operating on the same protocol.

No longer are users bound to a single proprietary vendor. Secondly, open protocols are typically viewed as being more secure and safer compared to proprietary technologies. This is because multiple groups of users are actively contributing to the improvement of the technology design and implementation.

Key features 

As a user exploring the implementation of wireless technologies here are some starting considerations:

  • Interoperability– Do users currently use a variety of instrumentation brands in the facility? If so, the majority of main instrumentation brands are already open-protocol enabled.
  • Scalability– Do users plan to scale the wireless operations in the future? Open protocols are the most cost-efficient to scale.
  • Technology development– How important is staying technology-relevant to the organization? Open protocols are continuously enhanced through working user groups and their relevancy is benchmarked to leading vendors and end users in the industry.

Depending on the application, both proprietary and open protocols have their own benefits. The industry is definitely trending towards more end-users being increasingly drawn to the advantages of open wireless technologies.

Download PDF version Download PDF version

In case you missed it

Emtelle USA Enhances Testing Capabilities With New Test Track
Emtelle USA Enhances Testing Capabilities With New Test Track

Emtelle USA, the American division of the globally renowned Emtelle Group, proudly announces the addition of an advanced test track at its fully operational 300,000 sq. ft facility...

PNR RailWorks Wins Five-Year Contract With VIA Rail Canada
PNR RailWorks Wins Five-Year Contract With VIA Rail Canada

PNR RailWorks Inc., Canada’s largest and most experienced full-service railroad contractor, has won a five-year contract with VIA Rail Canada Inc. (VIA) to perform maintena...

Leep Utilities Launches EHV Team For Data Centers
Leep Utilities Launches EHV Team For Data Centers

Following several high-profile data center contract wins, Leep Utilities - one of the UK's pioneering owners and operators of last-mile utility networks - has launched a specialist...

vfd